Streaming is often seen as a “nice-to-have” feature.

For this facility, it became a reliable monthly revenue stream.

This case study breaks down how a single-sheet ice rink implemented a modern streaming system and began generating consistent income — without upfront capital investment.

Facility Overview

  • Type: Single-sheet ice rink
  • Location: Midwest, United States
  • Teams: ~28 active teams
  • Players per team: ~15
  • Games per week: ~35–45

The Challenge

Before implementing streaming, the facility faced several limitations:

  • No way for families to watch games remotely
  • Missed revenue opportunities during games and events
  • Increasing demand from parents for video access
  • Difficulty differentiating from nearby competing rinks

They explored traditional streaming solutions but found:

  • Video quality was inconsistent
  • Camera views were too wide and hard to follow
  • Revenue potential was limited by low engagement

The Solution

The facility implemented a modern edge-based streaming system with:

  • High-quality camera hardware (not surveillance cameras)
  • Local edge processing for improved video performance
  • AI-driven tracking to follow gameplay
  • Cloud delivery for remote viewing

Most importantly:

The system was deployed with a revenue-share model, requiring little to no upfront investment.

Revenue Model

The rink used a combination of:

1. Monthly Subscriptions

  • Price: $20/month
  • Access: All games at the facility

2. Pay-Per-View (PPV)

  • Price: $10 per game
  • Used primarily for tournaments and special events

The Results

Subscriber Growth (First 90 Days)

  • Month 1: 120 subscribers
  • Month 2: 210 subscribers
  • Month 3: 340 subscribers

Growth was driven by:

  • Word of mouth among parents
  • Increased visibility during games
  • Improved viewing experience

Monthly Revenue Breakdown

Subscriptions

  • 340 subscribers × $20/month
    → $6,800/month

Pay-Per-View (Occasional Events)

  • ~150 viewers × $10 per event
    → $1,500 per event

Total Monthly Revenue

  • Recurring: $6,800/month
  • With events: $8,000+/month potential

Why It Worked

1. Higher Quality Increased Adoption

Because the stream was:

  • Clear
  • Smooth
  • Easy to follow

…more parents were willing to pay.

2. Better Experience = Higher Retention

Subscribers stayed because:

  • The system followed the play
  • Video quality was consistent
  • It felt closer to a real broadcast

3. No Upfront Cost Reduced Risk

The revenue-share model allowed the facility to:

  • Launch quickly
  • Avoid capital investment
  • Scale usage without financial pressure

4. Demand Already Existed

Parents already wanted:

  • Remote viewing
  • Game access for family members
  • Video for development and review

Streaming simply unlocked that demand.

Operational Impact

Beyond revenue, the facility saw:

  • Increased customer satisfaction
  • Stronger engagement from families
  • A competitive advantage over nearby rinks
  • Improved perception of the facility’s quality

Key Takeaways

  • Streaming can generate meaningful monthly revenue
  • Quality directly impacts adoption and retention
  • Revenue-share models reduce risk and accelerate deployment
  • Facilities often underestimate how strong demand already is

Could Your Facility See Similar Results?

Every facility is different, but the key drivers are consistent:

  • Number of teams
  • Game volume
  • Viewer demand
  • Streaming quality

The biggest factor isn’t whether revenue is possible —
it’s whether your system is capable of capturing it.

Request a Demo

Want to see what this could look like for your facility?

👉 Request a Demo
👉 Estimate Your Revenue Potential
👉 Talk to Our Team